Return to the scientific review
Source and license notes supplied with these plates. Plate inclusion does not add a study to the review or change its evidence rating.
Sources — Ultra-processed food (academic track)
This question is behavioral, not molecular: there is no molecular-scale open imagery that belongs to it. The molecular panel therefore shows the food scale — real, openly-licensed photographs of meals across the processing spectrum — plus clearly-labeled schematics. No micrographs were fabricated.
Images used
Molecular cascade (food-scale photographs)
- A fast-food meal (photograph)
- Source file:
Dog N Suds Drive In Fast Food Meal.jpg— burger, fries, coleslaw, root beer. - Author: Jerry Huddleston.
- License: CC BY 2.0 (Wikimedia Commons).
-
Attribution line on graphic: "Photo: Jerry Huddleston, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons."
-
A vegetable salad bowl (photograph)
- Source file:
Salad bowl, Kiedrich.jpg— leafy vegetables, mushrooms, herbs, bread. - Author: Gerda Arendt (Wikimedia Commons user).
- License: CC0 (Wikimedia Commons; public domain).
-
Attribution line on graphic: "Photo: CC0, via Wikimedia Commons."
-
"The proximal-property account" — schematic drawn by us, labeled "Schematic" on the graphic (not experimental data).
Cellular scene (food-scale photographs + design schematic)
- Fast-food meal, closer (photograph) — close crop of image 1 (same author, license CC BY 2.0).
- Salad bowl, closer (photograph) — close crop of image 2 (same source, CC0).
- "Matched crossover design" — schematic drawn by us, labeled "Schematic" on the graphic (not experimental data).
The graphics are labeled "Real photographs + labeled schematics" in the header chip, and the kicker reads "FOOD SCALE · REAL PHOTOGRAPHS" so the imagery's true scale is explicit.
Rejected candidates
- Several otherwise-suitable Wikimedia Commons images were rejected because they are licensed CC BY-SA, which the project policy forbids (open policy: CC0 or CC-BY only).
- Figures from papers cited in the page's review HTML that are not openly licensed were rejected — their rights do not permit reuse.
- Stock-photo style images without clear open licensing were not used; provenance had to be verifiable.