{
  "slug": "carbohydrate-insulin-obesity",
  "round": 2,
  "date": "2026-10-14",
  "authoring_model": "Sol 6.1 (score card records OpenAI Codex with HSEF v5.4; Claude red-team synthesis 2026-09-30)",
  "adversarial_reviewer": "Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)",
  "canonical": "consensus_consistency_audit_2026-10-09\\revised\\carbohydrate-insulin-obesity\\carbohydrate-insulin-obesity.review.md",
  "level_before": "Γ",
  "level_after": "Γ",
  "confidence_before": "High",
  "confidence_after": "High",
  "confidence_band_rederived": false,
  "confidence_note": "Checked against lead policy: the rationale contains no access-depth reasoning, so step 1 of the two-step test finds nothing to strike and step 2 does not apply. (Γ, High) is explicitly contemplated by the framework.",
  "approval": "Approved as revised",
  "pmids_checked": 44,
  "pmids_failed": 0,
  "retractions_found": 0,
  "corrections_verified": ["38609206", "40306286", "33144344", "29614160", "29710144", "31269427", "33027677"],
  "claims_spot_checked": 12,
  "validator": {"tool": "validate_review.py (archived HSEF v5.4)", "version": "2.4", "ok": true, "FAIL": 0, "WARN": 0, "PASS": 33, "warn_before": 5},
  "counts": {"critical": 0, "major": 1, "minor": 2, "editorial": 0},
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "CIO-1",
      "severity": "Major",
      "category": "misattributed provenance / spliced sentence",
      "location": "Consensus provenance reconciliation block",
      "original": "The earlier adversarial approval refers to its original edition; this provenance supplement is not a new independent or blinded adjudication.",
      "corrected": "The adversarial approval dated 2026-10-06 covered the separate prepublication research-update addendum for this topic (8 timeline identifiers), not this review document, which has never been adversarially approved before 2026-10-14; this provenance supplement is not an independent or blinded adjudication.",
      "evidence": "The 2026-10-06 approval exists but covers prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/carbohydrate-insulin-obesity/review-addendum.md (8 identifiers, 4 gap statements, 4 correction notices), not this 44-reference review."
    },
    {
      "id": "CIO-2",
      "severity": "Minor",
      "category": "invalid access_depth token (validator warnings)",
      "location": "citation_ledger rows 26, 28, 29, 30, 31",
      "original": "access_depth: metadata_only",
      "corrected": "access_depth: abstract_metadata",
      "evidence": "metadata_only is not one of the three framework-defined tokens; the rows are correspondence records which section 9 says carry only their existence and stated position. Five v5.access_depth warnings cleared."
    },
    {
      "id": "CIO-3",
      "severity": "Minor",
      "category": "internal consistency / nonexistent file reference",
      "location": "VALIDATION NOTE (and the mirrored scorecard field validator_warnings_addressed)",
      "original": "checked with HSEF validator 2.2 (output in carbohydrate-insulin-obesity.validation.txt). The original edition passed validator 2.4.",
      "corrected": "Validator 2.2 in the 2026-09-30 red-team pass; validator 2.4 (archived HSEF v5.4) for the consensus-consistency supplement and again on 2026-10-14; output in validation-report.json.",
      "evidence": "Versions were transposed relative to chronology, and no file of that name exists in this package or in the review working tree."
    }
  ],
  "rejected_findings": [
    "Confidence High beside Γ - upheld; rationale rests on evidence density and reproducibility with no access-depth reasoning; the framework explicitly contemplates (Γ, high).",
    "One print vs e-pub year difference of one (Soto-Mota) - standing convention.",
    "Best-supported rival renderer defect - rank 1 is is_nominal false; nominal M1 ranks 4.",
    "Collective author - reference 33 renders the DIOGENES consortium correctly; no dropped author or leading comma.",
    "Rendering defects - no glued numerals, no empty DOI field, no 'PMIDnot supplied' string.",
    "REVIEWER NOTES vs spliced Consensus section - no contradicting statement exists.",
    "Momentum - already 'Mechanistic only'; a design-only publication correctly treated as not satisfying 'Decisive work underway'.",
    "Dated fact - residential trial primary results confirmed still unpublished on 2026-10-14."
  ],
  "residual_limitations": "Refs 3 and 7 not read in full; refs 8, 15, 17 and 22-44 read at abstract depth. No packet rubric covers body-weight or energy regulation; rubric 06 thresholds remain a declared adaptation. No number re-derived from raw trial data in this pass.",
  "changed_files": [
    {"path": "carbohydrate-insulin-obesity.review.md", "sha256": "b5d08268df0dbc02ba76f4448e7b6b75bfab0dbd642ea60f65b83352979bb548", "bytes": 78381},
    {"path": "carbohydrate-insulin-obesity.scorecard.json", "sha256": "390442b5c6aaca273a3fe6f3bf67c5a6a88341b57ed9432e720d23640fedbe64", "bytes": 165002},
    {"path": "SHA256.txt", "note": "regenerated"},
    {"path": "validation-report.json", "note": "re-run, ok=true, 0 FAIL / 0 WARN / 33 PASS"}
  ],
  "propagate_to": [],
  "divergent_copies_not_touched": [],
  "package_level_strings_for_lead": [],
  "consensus_questions": [
    "In controlled human feeding trials of at least three weeks at matched energy and protein, does lowering dietary glycemic load produce greater body-fat loss (not only higher measured energy expenditure)?"
  ]
}