### Consensus provenance reconciliation — 9 October 2026

Case-specific Consensus discovery records were located and linked to this final edition. This supplements the review's provenance; it leaves the original assessed claim, grades and source counts intact. Provider summaries and full-text badges do not establish examination of original primary passages by this reviewer. Source access and incorporation retain the limits stated in the original methods and any dated research update.

Recorded evidence artifacts:

- `deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/epitalon-telomerase/consensus-browser-links.json`
- `deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/epitalon-telomerase/consensus-browser.txt`
- `deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/epitalon-telomerase/consensus-targeted-check.txt`

The located artifacts do not state a reliable source-comparison count. No count is inferred.

**Existing source reconciliation:** Yes; 8 identifiers; selected Methods/Results passage and correction PMID 41240216 noted; corrected figures not re-quantified. Targeted paper check covers specified cell lines/results only; correction means image-based quantitative claims need corrected-figure appraisal.

Matched primary identifiers in the preserved dated ledger: PMID 11087911, PMID 12937682, PMID 14501183, PMID 14523363, PMID 15455129, PMID 28241208, PMID 40493162, PMID 40908429. These are historical checks, not newly credited complete-paper examinations.

Shared template wording about an amyloid-specific Deep follow-up is not credited as a case-specific run for this topic. The actual raw case records above establish provider use.

No earlier adversarial approval has been verified for this edition at the supplement date. This provenance supplement has no separate approval and is not an independent or blinded adjudication. No score or confidence change is made by this reconciliation.