Eradication trials strongly support a causal contribution to infected peptic-ulcer disease. NSAID-associated, idiopathic and time-dependent bleeding outcomes define remaining questions rather than overturning the established infected-disease result.
This dated addendum adds selected evidence and tests that could resolve the remaining questions. It does not regrade the archived review.
Each question identifies a limit in the checked evidence. A missing search result alone does not establish a gap in the entire field.
Competing explanation: Reinfection, competing disease, medication changes or time-dependent susceptibility may contribute.
Discriminating test: Extended randomized-trial follow-up with repeat infection testing, medication ascertainment and prespecified time-varying/competing-risk analyses.
Competing explanation: NSAIDs or aspirin can damage mucosa independently of infection.
Discriminating test: Factorial or comparative randomized prevention designs stratified by drug exposure and ulcer history; monitor eradication and bleeding rather than symptoms alone.
Competing explanation: False-negative testing, occult drug exposure or distinct idiopathic biology may explain residual cases.
Discriminating test: Prospective repeat-test classification after appropriate washout, verified drug exposure and longitudinal endoscopic/bleeding outcomes.
Competing explanation: Inflammatory or mucosal effects may operate alongside gastrin/acid changes.
Discriminating test: Time-ordered physiological measurements within eradication studies and complementary mediator perturbation; distinguish statistical mediation from necessity.
Electronic publication dates are used where recorded, with issue years shown separately. This is a selected chronology, not a claim of scientific priority or independent replication for every entry.
Bacterial ingestion produced histologically documented gastritis.
What it cannot establish: Gastritis in one volunteer is not a controlled demonstration of chronic ulcer sufficiency.
Eradication markedly reduced long-term gastric and duodenal ulcer recurrence.
What it cannot establish: Failure to eradicate and NSAID exposure remained relevant.
Gastrin-mediated acid secretion decreased after eradication in duodenal-ulcer patients.
What it cannot establish: Paired mediator change does not isolate acid secretion as the only causal route.
Eradication reduced recurrent duodenal ulcer compared with placebo antibiotics.
What it cannot establish: Applies to infected recurrent-ulcer patients, not every ulcer etiology.
Eradication reduced ulcer occurrence during subsequent naproxen use.
What it cannot establish: Prevention at NSAID initiation differs from established chronic NSAID use.
Eradication and acid suppression differed by aspirin versus other NSAID use.
What it cannot establish: Drug-specific co-causation limits a universal eradication-only strategy.
H. pylori-negative, non-NSAID ulcers had substantial recurrent-bleeding risk.
What it cannot establish: Negative tests and etiological classification require careful validation.
Early bleeding prevention benefit was not sustained with longer follow-up.
What it cannot establish: Time-varying effects and low event incidence matter; later HTA reporting is the same trial.
Case-specific Consensus records assisted gap discovery, chronology and targeted paper questions. Shared template wording about an amyloid-specific Deep follow-up is not evidence of a Deep run for this topic; the dated source records establish the actual use and access limits. Primary identifiers, selected abstract passages, correction notices and available primary-body passages were cross-checked. Generated absence cells, duplicate milestones and unsupported access claims were rejected.
Primary abstract/metadata checked. Additional Consensus full-text details remain provider-reported because a separately readable body was unavailable in this update.
This focused addendum does not establish 50–70 complete primary Methods/Results examinations per review. Baseline reading receipts and scores retain their original scope.
Selected full-text checks: 0; abstract checks: 8; metadata-only anchors: 0. Complete-paper examinations credited in this update: 0.
New enrichment: HSEF v5.3 causal distinctions. Archived scorecard schema: 5.4; retained as recorded.
PMID 3982345 · DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1985.tb113443.x
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
PMID 1558340 · DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-116-9-705
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
PMID 8419816 · DOI 10.1056/NEJM199302043280503
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
PMID 8174954 · DOI 10.1136/gut.34.8.1060
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
PMID 9329511 · DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04523-6
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
PMID 11274623 · DOI 10.1056/NEJM200103293441304
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
PMID 19445937 · DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.006
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
PMID 36335970 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01843-8
Selected abstract passages checked. Primary record and selected abstract passages checked; no complete-paper appraisal credited.
Read the dated addendum · Video script and storyboard insert · References (RIS) · References (BibTeX)