Cutoff9October2026. Consensus supports discovery and checks of specific source aspects; it is not a primary study, a full-paper audit or a causal probability meter.
The original Finnish trial supports reduced eczema in a specified high-risk perinatal LGG regimen. This restricted positive result does not establish a universal probiotic effect, prevent every allergy, or identify protection from autoimmune disease. Original PMID11297958. Access: abstract_metadata.
In the original randomized comparison HN001 reduced eczema while HN019 did not, and atopy comparisons were nonsignificant. Consensus's broad wording about consistently positive eczema trials must retain this strain-specific contrast. Original PMID18762327. Access: abstract_metadata.
The original Wales trial had a null primary diagnosed-eczema comparison, with favorable secondary sensitization and atopic-eczema results. The body also shows enrollment of both familial-risk levels. The later five-year follow-up is the same parent trial, not independent replication. Original PMID24947281. Access: full_text_partial.
Consensus omitted ORBEX and portrayed bacterial-lysate evidence as largely biomarker-based. The original 822-participant report tested a clinical primary endpoint during subsequent off-treatment observation and found no significant benefit: hazard ratio1.16, confidence interval0.82–1.64. It is a completed clinical null, not an unreported biomarker-only study. Original PMID42705251. Access: abstract_metadata.
The original small randomized soil-enrichment study reports microbiome and immune-marker changes over14days. It does not demonstrate prevention of diagnosed allergy or autoimmunity. Consensus helped locate this original source, but the marker-to-disease boundary remains. Original PMID35930838. Access: abstract_metadata.
The original report pairs observational infant cohorts with injected LPS experiments in NOD mice. E. coli and B. dorei signals differ. It supports exposure-specific biology rather than a general rule that more microbes protect humans; the linked correction is retained, with its detailed changes unexamined. Original PMID27133167. Access: full_text_partial.
Consensus was used to identify literature and cross-check specific claims about design, endpoints, scope and research gaps. Those aspects were checked against original primary abstracts/status records and selected original Methods/Results passages. Consensus output was not treated as original full text. Provider search omissions are not evidence that a study does not exist. Source access and examination receipts are retained. Scite use or monthly unavailability is recorded per case; provider citation counts do not change causal grades.