### Consensus provenance reconciliation — 9 October 2026

Case-specific Consensus discovery records were located and linked to this final edition. This supplements the review's provenance; it leaves the original assessed claim, grades and source counts intact. Provider summaries and full-text badges do not establish examination of original primary passages by this reviewer. Source access and incorporation retain the limits stated in the original methods and any dated research update.

Recorded evidence artifacts:

- `deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/information-theory-aging/consensus-browser-links.json`
- `deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/information-theory-aging/consensus-browser.txt`
- `deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/information-theory-aging/consensus-targeted-check.txt`

The located artifacts do not state a reliable source-comparison count. No count is inferred.

**Existing source reconciliation:** Yes; 9 primary identifiers and abstract/metadata checks documented; service-reported additional full-text details kept distinct. No independently readable original body verified in update.

Matched primary identifiers in the preserved dated ledger: PMID 24529372, PMID 27984723, PMID 33268865, PMID 35235716, PMID 35390271, PMID 36638792, PMID 38012287, PMID 38381405, PMID 41589348. These are historical checks, not newly credited complete-paper examinations.

Shared template wording about an amyloid-specific Deep follow-up is not credited as a case-specific run for this topic. The actual raw case records above establish provider use.

No earlier adversarial approval has been verified for this edition at the supplement date. This provenance supplement has no separate approval and is not an independent or blinded adjudication. No score or confidence change is made by this reconciliation.