{
  "title": "What this review means",
  "includeSubclaimIllustrations": false,
  "redteamReviewed": true,
  "accessNotice": "Source checking used bounded original primary abstract passages/status records and selected original partial-body passages. No complete-abstract or complete-paper audit, or independent scientific peer review, is claimed. Detailed access counts and limitations appear in the review.",
  "overview": "Small selected mouth-taping pilots report lower apnea indices; controlled evidence for tape alone remains insufficient, and closing a compensatory oral airway can worsen airflow.",
  "implications": "The preregistered primary-subclaim rule selects SC2 Γ. Anatomical plausibility and uncontrolled positive clinical signals exist, but the exact tape-alone natural-sleep causal contrast is missing. The other three subclaims also return Γ, so the alternative aggregation rules do not change the nominal grade. CPAP-adjunct efficacy and wearable validation are retained as separate findings.",
  "limitations": "62 primary reports with 1 selected partial-body examinations; density, heterogeneous controls and incomplete access set the confidence, not correctness. The grade applies to the exact registered claim; stronger findings for narrower subclaims remain separate. No complete-paper audit or blinded calibration is claimed. This educational review does not establish an individual treatment recommendation."
}