{
  "completed": true,
  "status": "documented_historical_discovery_and_reconciliation",
  "provider": "Consensus",
  "provider_mode": "Historical browser/connector use as recorded in the source artifacts",
  "local_audit_date": "2026-10-09",
  "primary_comparison_count": null,
  "reported_usage": [],
  "grade_changed": false,
  "score_before": {
    "hsef_level": "Γ",
    "hsef_descriptor": "Mechanistically plausible, partial system support",
    "confidence": "Moderate",
    "confidence_rationale": "Multiple independent controlled human interventions exist, but they are small (9-69 participants), short (one meal to eight weeks), partly composition-confounded, concentrated in a few research networks, and in one key case registry-only [18]; several nulls cannot exclude modest effects. This matches the framework's Moderate definition ('Multiple independent studies; some replication; some assay-level concerns or methodological heterogeneity remains'), not High ('Extensive independent replication ... reproducibility well-established'). Confidence measures evidence density, not certainty that the strong claim fails (red-team RT-03; original: High).",
    "rests_on_non_peer_reviewed_work": false,
    "rationale": "Some ultra-processed whole-diet packages causally increase energy intake and relative short-term weight or fat gain, reaching Ε for those bounded subclaims. The submitted proposition additionally requires that the effect persist when nutrient composition is matched and be carried by processing-conferred properties characteristic of the category; those clauses remain Γ because the most direct composition-matched contrast is non-significant [18], matched designs are null [8,11,22], composition changes intake within UPF [21], and processing-conferred properties act in both directions within NOVA 4 [4,6,23,24]. The level does not rest on the registry-only result [18]."
  },
  "score_after": {
    "hsef_level": "Γ",
    "hsef_descriptor": "Mechanistically plausible, partial system support",
    "confidence": "Moderate",
    "confidence_rationale": "Multiple independent controlled human interventions exist, but they are small (9-69 participants), short (one meal to eight weeks), partly composition-confounded, concentrated in a few research networks, and in one key case registry-only [18]; several nulls cannot exclude modest effects. This matches the framework's Moderate definition ('Multiple independent studies; some replication; some assay-level concerns or methodological heterogeneity remains'), not High ('Extensive independent replication ... reproducibility well-established'). Confidence measures evidence density, not certainty that the strong claim fails (red-team RT-03; original: High).",
    "rests_on_non_peer_reviewed_work": false,
    "rationale": "Some ultra-processed whole-diet packages causally increase energy intake and relative short-term weight or fat gain, reaching Ε for those bounded subclaims. The submitted proposition additionally requires that the effect persist when nutrient composition is matched and be carried by processing-conferred properties characteristic of the category; those clauses remain Γ because the most direct composition-matched contrast is non-significant [18], matched designs are null [8,11,22], composition changes intake within UPF [21], and processing-conferred properties act in both directions within NOVA 4 [4,6,23,24]. The level does not rest on the registry-only result [18]."
  },
  "independent_blinded_audit": false,
  "raw_receipts": [
    {
      "path": "deliverables\\prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05\\website-series\\ultra-processed-food\\consensus-browser-links.json",
      "sha256": "5c114b266bbcfeb30c4f7e17f7dd3eabfde35c9ec70fc6f0d6fbad59e9d0df08"
    },
    {
      "path": "deliverables\\prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05\\website-series\\ultra-processed-food\\consensus-browser.txt",
      "sha256": "b546d9f124f0ca9362a5f90f68226d33631453bd6901b263468102b73452cafa"
    },
    {
      "path": "deliverables\\prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05\\website-series\\ultra-processed-food\\consensus-targeted-check.txt",
      "sha256": "3ea601c37be590e8b15d94379154456bc6c1783e6c3effa9d3f95ac4b52ca6d6"
    }
  ],
  "limitations": "This verifies documented historical use and links the record to the final edition. It adds no primary-source, full-text, independence or verification credit. Original access remains limited to the source-specific record.",
  "existing_primary_reconciliation": {
    "slug": "ultra-processed-food",
    "consensus_used": true,
    "rawproof": [
      "deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/ultra-processed-food/consensus-browser.txt",
      "deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/ultra-processed-food/consensus-targeted-check.txt",
      "deliverables/prepublication-enrichment-2026-10-05/website-series/ultra-processed-food/consensus-browser-links.json"
    ],
    "reconciliation_existing": "Yes; 9 primary identifiers; selected Results passage reconciled; timeline rejects generated CRISPR caption and marks shared registry/dependent reports.",
    "primary_sources_matched": [
      "31105044",
      "35285882",
      "37452167",
      "39267249",
      "40043691",
      "40760353",
      "41314613",
      "42588167",
      "42633852"
    ],
    "limitations": "No consumed-density matching inferred; shared registry reports not counted as independent cohorts; service body access is distinct from selected external body check."
  }
}